
Take your Dad.
Moderators: MostMint, wxo, Fred32v, Basement Paul, ttamrettus
Dave,TireSmoker wrote:For the entire summer, I just stuck with the Edelbrock Pro-Flo air cleaner. I had to cut off the little riser ring on the baseplate. The drop-base air cleaner might be an option -- it wasn't for me because I have an electric choke on the carb. Not sure it would've worked anyway. My solution is certainly less than ideal, but its workable for a driver.
What kind of heads are you going to use? I have Vortec heads, which apparently sit the intake manifold a little higher than the older conventional-style intakes. Edelbrock said the Performer for Vortec heads wouldn't fit under a Corvette hood, and after my experience, they're basically right. If you're using regular heads, you should be able to use a Performer, maybe even an RPM, but probably not an air-gap. Check Weiand too, the carb-pad height should be an available spec.
-Dave
I don't care about th look too much. As Tiresmoker pointed out, depending on the head design, my stock manifold might not work. If the heads are standard SBC (Gen 1) I could use my manifold, and might do that. If the heads are standard SBC and i use my manifold i won't have any clearance problems.GMJohnny wrote:Hey Oldvettedad.... Why are you going to switch the intake? Is the goal to
get extra horsepower or do you want a certain look, or..... ? I changed the
intake on my 87 442 from a stock aluminum intake with puny ports to a
stock cast intake that I had ported and the benefits were noticable. Later on
in the project, I put an Edelbrock Performer intake on the car trying to get
more power out of the package, and there was no difference in power. In fact
it never et'd better than it did with the cast intake. The stock manifold required
no fab work to hook up vacuum lines, choke, etc... I really like the stock look
in my cars, so when they look stock and perform real well, people scratch their
heads wondering what's going on. Just a thought.
GM